Legal Opinion

Yarberry v. Hertzler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1940No. 34,584PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action for damages alleged to have been sustained when defendant performed an operation upon plaintiff. Judgment was for defendant, sustaining a demurrer to the evidence of plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals.

The petition alleged that defendant performed an operation upon plaintiff on May 9,1934, for the removal of a part of her uterus, and that in performing the operation he used his instruments in a careless and negligent manner so as to cut an opening into the bladder of plaintiff; that plaintiff had had other operations to close this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Crystal Springs Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. State v. BallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Walker v. KressSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Cole v. DrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  5. Security State Bank v. SeaunierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gillen v. StangleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Andrews v. HeinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. In Re Estate of RegleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  4. Seaton v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API