Yarberry v. Hertzler
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
This was an action for damages alleged to have been sustained when defendant performed an operation upon plaintiff. Judgment was for defendant, sustaining a demurrer to the evidence of plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals.
The petition alleged that defendant performed an operation upon plaintiff on May 9,1934, for the removal of a part of her uterus, and that in performing the operation he used his instruments in a careless and negligent manner so as to cut an opening into the bladder of plaintiff; that plaintiff had had other operations to close this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Elliott v. Crystal Springs Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- State v. BallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Walker v. KressSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Cole v. DrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Security State Bank v. SeaunierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gillen v. StangleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- Andrews v. HeinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- In Re Estate of RegleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Seaton v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951