Legal Opinion

Security State Bank v. Seaunier

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 11, 1919No. 21,605PublishedCited by 12 opinions

, Appeal from Wilson district, court; James W. Finley, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The defendant appeals from a judgment rendered against him on a promissory note given to M. G. Slocum, an itinerant doctor who advertised his business by a dog, pony, *8and medicine show. The note was given for medical services which Slocum promised to render to the defendant’s wife. Slocum transferred the note to the plaintiff. The defense was that the note had been obtained by fraud and was without consideration, and that the plaintiff had purchased the note in bad faith with knowledge of the fraud.

1. The defendant’s first assignment of error…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ireland v. ShoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Treiber v. McCormackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Leach v. UrschelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Walker v. KressSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Cole v. DrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. City of McPherson v. StuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Ranchmens Trust Co. v. GillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API