Gartrell v. Department of Correction
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff, Derrick Gartrell, who suffered from a preexisting, nonwork-related psychiatric condition that was aggravated by a work-related physical injury, is entitled to workers’ compensation benefits for the aggravation of that psychiatric condition notwithstand*139ing General Statutes § 31-275 (16) (B) (ii),1 which limits compensation for mental or emotional impairments to those that “[arise] from” a work-related physical injury. We conclude that the plaintiff is entitled to workers’ compensation benefits to the extent that his…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Szudora v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Luce v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Doe v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Six v. Thomas O'Connor & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Muldoon v. Homestead Insulation Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gartrell v. Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001