Legal Opinion
Popanz v. Peregrine Corp.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided April 30, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Vickie L. Popanz appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Calkins, J.) in favor of Peregrine Corporation. Popanz contends, inter alia, that the court erred as a matter of law by determining that her employment contract claim was barred by the statute of frauds; and by granting a summary judgment given the existence of material facts in dispute regarding the existence of an employment contract. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
[¶ 2] Popanz began working for the Peregrine Corporation in 1991. 1 In 1993, the then executive…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jacques v. Pioneer Plastics, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Struck v. HackettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Gayer v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Gerrity Co., Inc. v. Lake Arrowhead Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Stearns v. Emery-Waterhouse Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Daigle Commercial Group, Inc. v. St. LaurentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Knowlton v. ShawDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2011
- U.S. Bank National Association v. Christopher J. CuritSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Ingram v. Rencor Controls, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2002