King-Fisher Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO QUASH AND FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER AND TO SHOW CAUSE WHY AN ATTORNEY WHO IS A POTENTIAL WITNESS AT TRIAL SHOULD NOT BE DISQUALIFIED
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Presently pending before the court is plaintiffs October 28, 2003 motion to quash the deposition subpoena served on Mr. Richard P. Reichstein, Esquire and for a protective order precluding the taking of his deposition. In considering this request, the court finds that it must also resolve whether Mr. Reichstein can continue to represent the plaintiff in this case. For the following reasons, the court hereby DENIES…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Paul A. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Johnston Development Group, Inc. v. Carpenters Local Union No. 1578District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. WiseDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marsha Seiber and Alvin Seiber v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Gulf Group General Enterprises Co. W.L.L. V. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- EDUCATION CREDITOR TRUST v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
- United States v. Optrex America, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2004