Legal Opinion

Fish v. . Hanson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1943PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

Family agreements looking to tbe advantageous settlement of estates or to tbe adjustment of family differences, disputes or controversies, wben approved by tbe court, are valid and binding. Tbey are bottomed on a sound public policy wbicb seeks to preserve estates and to promote and encourage family accord. Spencer v. McCleneghan, 202 N. C., 662, 163 S. E., 753; In re Estate of Wright, 204 N. C., 465, 168 S. E., 664; Reynolds v. Reynolds, 208 N. C., 578, 182 S. E., 341; Bohannon v. Trotinan, 214 N. C., 706, 200 S. E., 852; Scbouler, Wills, Executors and Administrators (6d), sec. 3103.

Tbe…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reynolds Ex Rel. Cannon v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Matthews v. Fry.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Buchanan v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Bohannon v. TrotmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Bohannon v. . TrotmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bizzell v. BizzellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Town of Burnsville v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Redwine v. . ClodfelterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Poole v. . GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. O'Neil v. O'NeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API