Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kostich

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2010No. 2009AP287-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of Referee Christine Harris Taylor concluding that Attorney Ni-kola E Kostich engaged in unprofessional conduct in violation of the rules of professional conduct. The referee recommended a public reprimand and imposition of costs, which total $9,760.46 as of March 10, 2010. No appeal has been filed in this matter. See SCR 22.17(2).1

¶ 2. We approve the referee's findings and conclusions. We consider a public reprimand barely adequate for the egregious conflict of interest and therefore also impose the additional…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Marten Transport, Ltd. v. Hartford Specialty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against KalalWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against KostichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against KostichWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Waukesha County v. M.A.C.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2024
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. KostichWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Debra K. Sands v. John R. Menard, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Joshua M. Wren v. Reed RichardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Joshua M. Wren v. Reed RichardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API