Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Kostich

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1986No. 86-0676-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

A ttorney disciplinary proceeding; attorney publicly reprimanded.

The referee in this disciplinary proceeding recommended that Attorney Nikola P. Kostich be publicly reprimanded for having willfully and knowingly failed to file a federal individual income tax return. The referee also recommended that Attorney Kostich be ordered to pay the costs of this proceeding. We agree that a public reprimand is appropriate discipline for Attorney Kostich's misconduct.

Attorney Kostich was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1970 and practices in Milwaukee. He has not previously been the subject of a…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. KostichWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. KostichWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Joshua M. Wren v. Reed RichardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Joshua M. Wren v. Reed RichardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API