Legal Opinion

Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago R. W. Co. v. Rayl

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1880PublishedCited by 24 opinions

From the Howard Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

The complaint in this case averred, that WiHiam Rayl and Christian Rayl were, and for twenty years then immediately preceding had been, the owners in fee-simple of lots Nos. 64, 65, 66 and 67 in the City of Kokomo; that said lots adjoined and abutted against the east line or side of what was called or known as Buckeye or Railroad street, in said city ; that- the. main line of the railway belonging to the Indianapolis, Peru and Chicago Railway Company ran along and upon said street, at a distance of forty feet west of, and parallel with, the said east line of such street, leaving what was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. King v. ReaIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Uhl v. Ohio River RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Macy Elevator, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Quick v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Neitzel v. Spokane International Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Douglass v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API