Poole v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
This is a review of an Industrial Commission award denying compensability because Donald Clayton Poole was injured during a personal errand that did not substantially benefit his employer, Chem-Clean. We must decide whether Poole’s personal errand arose out of and in the course of his employment because he was subject to call and other alleged special circumstances. Because we find insufficient evidence of other special circumstances and Poole’s errand remained personal despite his being subject to call, we affirm the award.
*449Facts and Procedural History
Chem-Clean…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pauley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Circle K Store 1131 v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Martin v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Fisher Contracting Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Connors v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Higginbotham v. AN MOTORS OF SCOTTSDALECourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012