Legal Opinion

Bertelson v. Hoffman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1904No. 4737PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Huston, J., entered December 5, 1902, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff.

1Per curiam

B. Bertelson, plaintiff, commenced an action in the superior court of Pierce county against D. M. Hoffman, defendant, to recover $500, alleged to have been earned by Bertelson as a broker’s commission in procuring a purchaser for defendant Hoffman’s real estate, situate in the city of Tacoma, known as the Board of Trade saloon. The complaint alleges, the listing of the property by the defendant with plaintiff for sale, upon terms fixed by Hoffman, being five thousand dollars in hand, or to- be paid on consummation of sale, and the balance — thirteen thousand dollars — to be paid on or before…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carstens v. McReavyWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Buckingham v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  3. Veasey v. CarsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  4. Baars v. HylandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Wheeler v. F. A. Buck & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lawler v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. McCleary v. WillisWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Hendryx v. TurnerWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Boeding v. KirkpatrickWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Lee E. Hartman & Co. v. HechtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API