Legal Opinion

Neal v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 1986No. 14220PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

Appellant was convicted of selling marijuana, which conviction was affirmed on appeal. See State v. Neal, 624 S.W.2d 182 (Mo.App.1981). He then filed a motion under Rule 27.26, seeking to vacate the conviction. Following an evidentiary hearing the trial court denied the motion. On appeal all of appellant’s points except point IV were denied. It was determined that to rule on that point two additional findings were required. The case was then remanded to the trial court for that purpose. See Neal v. State, 669 S.W.2d 254 (Mo.App.1984).

In point IV, appellant asserted that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Zepp, Jo-Ann. Appeal of Jo Ann ZeppCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. Brooks v. KunzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  4. State v. NealMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Perryman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CrenshawMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Ford v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Wolford v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Hayman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Roberts v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API