Legal Opinion
Ford v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 26, 1988No. 53952PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOWD, Judge.
Appellant Michael Ford appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an eviden-tiary hearing. We affirm.
*256Appellant was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court in the City of St. Louis of capital murder and was sentenced to life imprisonment without eligibility of parole for fifty years. His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal in State v. Ford, 585 S.W.2d 472 (Mo. banc 1979) which contains a statement of facts describing the events leading to the conviction.
On October 15, 1984, appellant filed his Rule 27.26 motion, and on May 18, 1987, he filed his first amended Rule…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Walker v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- O'NEAL v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. PowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Michael Wayne Ford v. Michael BowersoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- State v. MessenheimerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Michael Wayne Ford v. Michael BowersoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001