Motorola Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
This ease is before us on the plaintiffs unopposed petition for leave to take an interlocutory appeal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), from an order that the district judge has certified for an immediate appeal. We grant the petition for reasons explained below; and because the petition and the’ response, together with the district judge’s opinion explaining her order and the record in the district court, provide an ample basis for deciding the appeal, we dispense with further briefing and with oral argument.
Motorola and its foreign subsidiaries buy liquid-crystal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mid-State Fertilizer Co., Lasley Kimmel, and Maxine Kimmel v. Exchange National Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- George Ryan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Angus Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Disenos Artisticos E Industriales, S.A. v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lotes Co. v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Motorola Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Hui HsiungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lotes Co., Ltd. v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Motorola Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015