Legal Opinion
Motorola Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 26, 2014No. 14-8003PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
Back in March we granted the plaintiffs unopposed petition for leave to take an interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) from an order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the defendants (which include Samsung, Sanyo, and several other foreign companies besides AU Optronics), thereby extinguishing most of the plaintiffs case. The district judge certified the order for an immediate appeal. We agreed to hear the appeal, and without asking for further briefing or oral argument affirmed the district court’s decision in an opinion, reported at 746 F.3d…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Mid-State Fertilizer Co., Lasley Kimmel, and Maxine Kimmel v. Exchange National Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Lotes Co. v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. Hui HsiungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- In re Dealer Management Systems Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
- McGarry & McGarry, LLC v. Bankruptcy Management SolutionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Bank of Sun Prairie v. Kentucky Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- M & M Realty Partners at Hagen Ranch, LLC v. William MazzoniCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.