Legal Opinion

Arata v. Downer

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1937No. Civ. 5822PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

—Plaintiffs sued to ejoin the sale of certain real property under a deed of trust given by plaintiffs to secure four promissory notes, and for an accounting. The accounting was had, which resulted in the court’s finding that plaintiffs were indebted to the Bank of Pinole, the beneficiary under the deed of trust in a sum in excess of $40,000, and denied an injunction preventing the sale of property under said trust.

From this judgment an appeal was taken upon a bill of exceptions. As grounds of appeal it is asserted the decision is against law and contrary to the evidence in various…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meyer v. ZuberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Witter v. Bank of MilpitasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Ravano v. SayreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Paul Londe & Associates, Inc. v. RathertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API