Citizens' Utility Board v. Oregon Public Utility Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.
The question in this case is whether, when it issued its Order No. 91-1140 establishing extended area telephone service (EAS) 1 for the Portland metropolitan area, the Public Utility Commission (PUC) committed reversible error. The Citizens’ Utility Board (CUB) has taken issue with an interlocutory ruling of PUC, Order No. 91-958, protecting from public disclosure certain documents said to contain confidential cost accounting methods of U S West Communications (USWC). CUB also challenges PUC’s ruling that revenues collected for extended area service may not be refunded to customers if, after…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Goldsborough v. Eagle Crest Partners, Ltd.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Farmers Ins. Group of Oregon v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. EachusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Chase Gardens, Inc. v. Oregon Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Pfizer Inc. v. Oregon Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- City of Scappoose v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996