Legal Opinion

City of Scappoose v. Public Utility Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 10, 1996No. 94-2001; CA A88205Published

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Defendant Public Utility Commission (PUC) appeals from the trial court’s judgment reversing PUC’s orders holding that the Scappoose Telephone Exchange does not meet the tests for inclusion in the Portland Extended Area Service (EAS) region. We reverse.

Plaintiffs are the City of Scappoose and other users of the telephone exchange (collectively Scappoose). They brought this circuit court action pursuant to ORS 756.580 et seq, seeking to set aside the three PUC orders through which Scappoose was found to be ineligible for inclusion in the Portland EAS region. See ORS 756.040.

PUC has developed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Trebesch v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Citizens' Utility Board v. Oregon Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API