Legal Opinion

Wood v. Sprague

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1940PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is an action by heirs against the state land board to recover moneys alleged to have escheated to the state.

The state board of control intervened and set np its claim to have paid to it from the fund the reasonable unpaid cost to the state of the care and maintenance of the deceased while a ward of the Oregon state hospital and while a ward of the Eastern Oregon state hospital.. General Laws of Oregon 1937, Ch. 217.

A jury trial on the main issue of fact, that is whether the plaintiffs were the lawful heirs of the deceased and hence entitled to the fund, resulted in a verdict in their…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Beers Ex Rel. Platenius v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Matter of People (Melrose Ave.)New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. State Land Board v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Patterson v. Horsefly Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Young v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Haley v. SpragueOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Rogers v. HOLMESOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Mayagüez Light, Power & Ice Co. v. Tribunal de Contribuciones de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1948
  4. Borovskaya v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Gowin v. HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API