Legal Opinion

Negron v. Llarena

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 23, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

716 A.2d 1158 (1998)

156 N.J. 296

Martha NEGRON, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of William Negron and Martha Negron, Personally, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Ramon LLARENA, M.D., Defendant-Respondent, and

Ligija Rociunas, M.D., Defendant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 23, 1997.

Decided July 23, 1998.

David Taback, a member of the New York bar, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant (Callan, Regenstreich, Koster & Brady, Shrewsbury, attorneys; Barbara Brosnan Rivera, on the brief).

Jared P. Kingsley, Clark, for defendant-respondent (Bumgardner, Hardin & Ellis, attorneys).

The…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Handler; Concurrence · Handler.

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Mobil Oil Corp. v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  5. Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API