Williams v. Ribicoff

CAMERON, Circuit Judge.

Appellants’ claims to social security benefits here depend solely upon whether their deceased mother, Sharon Williams, was a partner with their father, Cleo Williams, in the small business “Williams Rolling Store.” The court below found that the decision of the Secretary, answering the question in the negative and thus denying benefits, was supported by substantial evidence, in fact, “by the greater weight of the more convincing material submitted * * *.”

Upon an examination of the record, we conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support a decision either way on…