Legal Opinion

Librada Ortega Hinojos v. Railroad Retirement Board

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 24, 1963No. 20166_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Circuit Judge.

The question involved in this petition for review of a decision of the Railroad Retirement Board is whether the Board erred in determining that petitioner is not the common-law widow of the deceased insured railroad employee, Luis Hinojos. The determination of marital status must be made, of course, according to the laws of the domicile of the deceased employee, 1 Texas in this case. If petitioner is Hinojos’ widow, she is entitled to the residual lump-sum payment provided by 45 U.S.C.A. § 228e (f) (2) (i).

The following facts are not in dispute: the employee Hinojos…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Grigsby v. ReibTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Shelton v. BelknapTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Consolidated Underwriters v. KellyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  4. Kelly v. Consolidated UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Squires v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carty v. ThalerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. In Re LevaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1989
  3. Frank G. Kurka v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Williams v. RibicoffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  5. Jones v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API