Legal Opinion
Chilin Morales v. Humphrey
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 18, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-1363PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs in this case are three maintenance workers formerly employed by a residential landlord in the District of Columbia. In this suit, they allege that in 2012, 2013, and 2014, their erstwhile employer, Defendant Melvin Humphrey, failed to pay them overtime wages as required by D.C. and federal law. The federal statute they believe entitles them to overtime payment is the Fair Labor Standards Act, which mandates time-and-a-half wages for hours worked over forty each week. See 29 U.S.C. § 207(a)(1). The Act, however,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Astudillo v. Salon MacOmb, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Martinez v. Asian 328, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Seo v. OhDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021