Legal Opinion
Seo v. Oh
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 23, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2018-0785Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KANG KYU SEO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 18-785 (RDM) CHARLES MOON SUK OH, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, four former employees of a liquor store in Washington D.C., allege that Defendants willfully failed to pay them minimum and overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”),
29 U.S.C. § 201
et seq., and the District of Columbia Wage Payment and Collection Law (“DCWPCL”),
D.C. Code § 32-1301
et seq. See Dkt. 1 at 1–2 (Compl.). Now before the Court are Plaintiffs’ motion for summary…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.