Legal Opinion

Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Felton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 28, 1934No. 4-3475PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, C. J.

On the threshold of this case we are confronted with the contention, advanced by appellee, that appellant’s contentions, as evidenced in the motion for new trial, cannot here be considered for the reason that said motion was filed without the time given by § 1314, Crawford & Moses’ Digest, of the laws of Arkansas. Although this contention presents a very serious question, it relates to this case only. Therefore we pretermit consideration or determination thereof, because the case must be affirmed on its merits.

In 1924 appellant issued and delivered its contract of insurance to one William F.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pfeiffer v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Ætna Life Insurance v. PhiferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  3. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  4. Missouri State Life Insurance v. FosterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Smith v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. WingfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. Jabara v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  3. Manhattan Construction Company v. AtkissonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  4. The Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. SpringerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  5. Boal v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API