Legal Opinion
Boss v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 27, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2025-0616Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STANLEY BOSS, Plaintiff, v. No. 25-cv-616 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Stanley Boss, proceeding pro se, alleges that Defendant Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP (“Pillsbury”) initiated a United States Customs Immigration Services (“USCIS”) citizenship inquiry into him to disadvantage him in future employment, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) and the Eighth Amendment. Am. Compl. at 1, ECF No. 30. The court granted Boss’s motion to amend his complaint,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.