Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Berry

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1968No. Crim. 12621PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.

Defendant was originally charged with five counts of violation of section 288 of the Penal Code. Trial by jury was duly waived and the matter was submitted on the transcript of the preliminary examination. On motion of the People, the information was amended, by interlineation, so as to include language charging a violation of section 647a of the Penal Code. Thereafter, the following proceedings occurred:

“Me. Geragos [deputy district attorney] : With reference to the Court’s determination of this matter, I would like to state at this time that the People did move to amend this Information to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. SuccopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Gross v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. In re CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. RowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. People v. HarvathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. People v. ColvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. People v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. People v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API