Legal Opinion

City of Connersville v. Merrill

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1896No. 1,375PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

This action was instituted by the appellant against tbe appellees, to foreclose an assessment lien for tbe improvement of a sidewalk, amounting to $286.85, under tbe act of 1889 and tbe amendments thereto in 1891. Elliott Supp., section 812 to 822, inclusive; Acts 1891, page 323; sections 4288 to 4298, E. S. 1894.

In tbe court below a demurrer was sustained to tbe *305complaint. This ruling is the basis of the only error assigned in this court.

The first objection urged by appellees to the complaint is that it fails to show that the ordinance or resolution for the improvement was passed by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Lafayette v. FowlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Taber v. FergusonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Sims v. HinesIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. DePuy v. City of WabashIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Reeves v. GrottendickIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lux & Talbott Stone Co. v. DonaldsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. City of Bluffton v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Hodges v. City of RoswellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Holswade v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Willard v. AlbertsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API