DePuy v. City of Wabash
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Wabash Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.
The appellants make three assignments of error in this court: First, upon the ruling of the lower court in sustaining a motion for an entry, nunc pro tunc, of a ruling upon a demurrer to the original complaint; second, the sustaining of a demurrer to the amended complaint ; third, the action of the court in dissolving the restraining order issued upon the original complaint.
The first assignment is not discussed hy the appellants, *337and will, therefore, not be considered. The third assignment is conceded, by appellants, to he unavailing if the complaint was had on demurrer, and we may suggest…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. EdgertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- McEneney v. Town of SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Prezinger v. HarnessIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Taber v. FergusonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by21 opinions
- Knowles v. New Sweden Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Town of Crown PointIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Cason v. City of LebanonIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Lux & Talbott Stone Co. v. DonaldsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Duniway v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1905
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.