Legal Opinion

DePuy v. City of Wabash

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1893No. 16,097PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Wabash Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

The appellants make three assignments of error in this court: First, upon the ruling of the lower court in sustaining a motion for an entry, nunc pro tunc, of a ruling upon a demurrer to the original complaint; second, the sustaining of a demurrer to the amended complaint ; third, the action of the court in dissolving the restraining order issued upon the original complaint.

The first assignment is not discussed hy the appellants, *337and will, therefore, not be considered. The third assignment is conceded, by appellants, to he unavailing if the complaint was had on demurrer, and we may suggest…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. EdgertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. McEneney v. Town of SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Prezinger v. HarnessIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Taber v. FergusonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Knowles v. New Sweden Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Town of Crown PointIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Cason v. City of LebanonIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Lux & Talbott Stone Co. v. DonaldsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Duniway v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API