Legal Opinion

United States v. Lloyd

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 22, 1997No. 97 C 2799, 97 C 3020, 97 C 3137 and 97 C 3140. No. 89 CR 427PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, Chief Judge:

Raising a variety of claims, co-conspirators Mario Lloyd (Mario), Charles Lloyd (Charles), Jairo Soto-Rodriguez, and Gustavo Calle each filed a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 asking that we amend, or in some instances vacate, the sentences we imposed on them for their roles in a cocaine distribution scheme. All four are acting pro se. For the reasons given below, we grant the motion of Mario in part and deny it in part; we deny the motion of Charles; we grant the motion of Soto-Rodriguez in part and deny it in part; and we deny the motion of…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Mario Howard LloydCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  2. RICHARD Z. DUFFEE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Snow v. PfisterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  4. Haywood v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
  5. Juan Zamudio v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API