United States v. Lloyd
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, Chief Judge:
Raising a variety of claims, co-conspirators Mario Lloyd (Mario), Charles Lloyd (Charles), Jairo Soto-Rodriguez, and Gustavo Calle each filed a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 asking that we amend, or in some instances vacate, the sentences we imposed on them for their roles in a cocaine distribution scheme. All four are acting pro se. For the reasons given below, we grant the motion of Mario in part and deny it in part; we deny the motion of Charles; we grant the motion of Soto-Rodriguez in part and deny it in part; and we deny the motion of…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Mario Howard LloydCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- RICHARD Z. DUFFEE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Snow v. PfisterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Haywood v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Juan Zamudio v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.