Legal Opinion

In Re Claim for Compensation of Kum v. Sugiyama

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1935No. 2152PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

COKE, C. J.

The bill of exceptions of the Ocean Accident and Guarantee Corporation, Limited, plaintiff in error, brings up for review certain rulings of the circuit court of the first judicial circuit as well as its decision and the judgment rendered thereon.

The facts, as we understand them from the record and the uncontroverted recitations in the briefs submitted by the parties, summarized are as follows: In the month of May, 1932, one Kim Kwan Yun was an employee of T. Sugiyama, who operated a quarry at Waialee, City and County of Honolulu. While in the course of his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. The State of Rhode Island v. the State of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  3. Lynde v. LyndeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. O'Brien v. People ex rel. Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Johnson v. Chicago & Pacific Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KwakHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. GustafsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  3. O'DANIEL v. Inter-Island Resorts, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  4. In Re the Guardianship of CarlsmithHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Kogoshima v. Kaimi A.K.A. LewisHawaii Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API