Legal Opinion

State v. Gustafson

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1973No. 5397PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellant struck a utility pole while driving an automobile on Kinau Street in Honolulu. The investigating police officer, believing appellant to be under the influence of alcohol, placed him under arrest and requested that he take a “breath or blood” test under the implied consent statute, HRS ch. 286. Upon his refusal to submit to a test, the officer executed and filed an affidavit with the magistrate of the district court of Honolulu as required by HRS § 286-155.1 A hearing was held before the district judge pursuant to HRS § 286-156. At the hearing the district judge found the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. State v. TexeiraHawaii Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. BarnesHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Matter of GriffithsIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. DavenportHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. RosboroughHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. DecanoHawaii Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API