Legal Opinion

Daniels v. United States Rubber Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 19, 1946No. 2689PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LESTER, Chief Justice.

This suit was brought by the United States Rubber Company against Louis Daniels to recover from him an amount alleged to be due it for tires sold to him, for which he had not paid. Mrs. M. L. Levine and Mrs. Juie Levine Daniels were guarantors on the contract between Daniels and the Rubber Company.

Appellant Daniels answered appellee’s petition with a counter claim, alleging that he was entitled to certain discounts, tire adjustments, etc., for which he had not received credit. The court, without application of either party but upon its own motion, appointed an auditor to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heid Bros., Inc. v. Commercial Nat. Bank of HutchinsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. Cook v. PeacockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Bush v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Smith Detective Agency, Inc. v. Security Nat BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Tracy v. Willacy CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Duval County Ranch Co. v. Alamo Lumber Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1983
  2. Ware v. HarkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Griffin v. SevierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Chandler v. BessingerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API