Urdangen & Greenberg Bros. v. Doner
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Monroe District Court. — Hon. F. W. Eiched-berg-er, Judge. Suit to recover specific personal property or its value, taken from the plaintiffs under a writ of attachment. The defendant alleged a fraudulent purchase of the property by the plaintiffs. There was a trial to a jury, and a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs. The defendant appeals. — ■
1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.
The plaintiffs bought the stock of goods involved in this litigation of insolvent debtors only a day or two before the attachments were levied and the goods taken, and the sole fact issue in the case was whether the purchase was fraudulent as to the vendor’s creditors. This issue has been exhaustively argued by both sides, and we have given the evidence the careful examination and consideration which the importance of the case demanded, and have reached the conclusion that we should not interfere with the verdict. Some suspicious circumstances were developed upon the trial, it is true, but…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- M. Rosenheim & Son v. Flanders SistersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Jones v. HetheringtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Curl v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Bixby v. CarskaddonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Neuffer v. MoehnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pike v. CoonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Knabe v. KirchnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
- Corn Belt Savings Bank v. BurnettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Flood v. BollmeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Hogeboom v. MillimanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.