Bixby v. Carskaddon
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Benton Circuit Oowrt. Action to recover specific personal property. Trial by jury. Judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevees, J.
This is a second appeal. See 68 Iowa, 164 The plaintiff claims to llave purcbaséd the goods in controversy of one Billings,, and the defendants pleaded that such purchase and sale was made.to hinder and delay the creditors of Billings, and was therefore fraudulent.
I. Prior to the last trial "the defendants filed a pleading, admitting that the plaintiff was in possession of the prop-i. practice: of'proof’í anacióse.1*611 erty in controversy, and that he was rightfully entitled to such possession, that the detention of the goods by the sheriff was wrongful, and that the plaintiff was damaged in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Forbes v. DelashmuttSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Hardy v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Bixby v. CarskaddonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hutchinson v. PoyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Thomas v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Urdangen & Greenberg Bros. v. DonerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Muir v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Cedar Rapids National Bank v. LaverySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.