Legal Opinion

United States v. Carl Six

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 13, 2015No. 14-1439UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OLIVER, District Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Carl Shaw-Vincent Six (“Defendant-Appellant,” “Defendant,” “Appellant,” or “Six”), appeals his conviction in district court for being a felon in possession of a firearm under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and denial of his Motion for New Trial. For the reasons stated herein, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court and the district court’s denial of his Motion for New Trial.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Defendant was indicted on March 21, 2012, for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The Government…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Stephen ArnyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Maurice Duncan BurksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. Skakel v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  4. Skakel v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API