Legal Opinion
United States v. Stephen Arny
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 1, 2016No. 15-6130PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.
After a three-day jury trial, Stephen Arny, M.D., was convicted of conspiracy to distribute and unlawfully dispense several prescription pain medications in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Approximately three months after the verdict, but before sentencing, Arny secured new counsel, who later moved for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 based on trial counsel’s constitutionally ineffective assistance. The district court granted the motion based on its finding that Arny’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel had been…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Jeffrey D. Lundgren v. Betty Mitchell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Davis v. LaflerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kwame Ajamu v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- United Specialty Ins. Co. v. Cole's Place, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. David SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Ricky Jackson v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Maurice Duncan BurksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.