Aragon v. RISE Law Group, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION HEATHER ARAGON, Civ. No. 1:22-cv-00935-CL Plaintiff, ORDER v. RISE LAW GROUP, INC.; MARYANNE PITCHER; and JAMIE HAZLETT, Defendants. _______________________________________ AIKEN, District Judge: Before the Court are Findings and Recommendations (“F&R”) filed by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. ECF No. 93. Judge Clarke recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, ECF No. 61, be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. For the reasons explained below, the Court ADOPTS Judge Clarke’s F&R, ECF No. 93,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Rex L. Bothell v. Phase Metrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Martha Skidmore Clark v. J.M. Benson Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.