Legal Opinion

Waldorf v. Cole

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1963No. 36265PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This is a boundary dispute arising from an approximate 15-foot shortage on the ground compared with the distance shown on the recorded plat.

Block 2 of the Replat of Blocks 1 and 2, Lake Shore View Addition, as it appears on the plat, has 20 lots each having a 30-foot frontage on 45th Ave. N. E., and 20 lots each having a 30-foot frontage on 46th Ave. N. E. These are north and south streets. Each lot is shown as having a depth of 120 feet and, there being no alley, the block, as platted, is 240 feet in its east-west dimension.

On the ground, the north line of the block (being the south line of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mullally v. ParksWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Thomas v. HarlanWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Scott v. SlaterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Dibirt v. BoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Nattin v. GlassellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lamm v. McTigheWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Condos v. TrappWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Draszt v. NaccaratoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. Hanson v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Leslie Pendergrast, App-cross Resp v. Robert Matichuk, Resp-cross AppCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API