Legal Opinion

Munoz v. PHH Mortgage Corp.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 10, 2022No. 1:08-cv-00759Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 EFRAIN MUNOZ, individually and on 4 behalf of all others similarly situated, 5 et al., No. 1:08-cv-00759-MMB-BAM 6 7 Plaintiffs, ORDER RESPECTING 8 PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION 9 v. IN LIMINE #5 10 11 PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, 12 et al., 13 14 Defendants. 15 Plaintiffs’ fifth motion in limine (ECF 468, at 12–15) requests an order 16 “to exclude Defendants . . . from presenting any argument, evidence, or testi- 17 mony, including expert testimony, that Atrium provided valuable services to 18 the mortgage insurers other than or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boyd v. General Revenue Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API