Legal Opinion
Armour Research Foundation of Illinois Institute of Technology v. C. K. Williams & Co.
District Court, E.D. Illinois
Decided February 27, 1959No. Civ. A. Nos. 3200, 3438PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUERGENS, District Judge.
This litigation was commenced by the plaintiff Armour Research Foundation of Illinois Institute of Technology (hereinafter referred to as Armour) against C. K. Williams & Co., Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Williams), defendant in Civil Action No. 3200 and plaintiff Armour against Technical Tape Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Technical Tape), defendant in Civil Action No. 3438. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (hereinafter referred to as Minnesota) was subsequently, by order of this Court, brought in as a necessary party plaintiff. The two suits…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Egbert v. LippmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- General Electric Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Audio Devices, Inc. v. Armour Research Foundation of Illinois Institute of TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- United States v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1966
- Audio Devices, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- ARMOUR RESEARCH FOUNDATION, ETC. v. CK Williams & Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1959