Legal Opinion

United States v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided January 5, 1966No. Crim. A. No. 61-73-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUERGENS, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon the propriety of accepting a plea of NOLO CONTENDERE on behalf of the defendant, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company.

The Court has never looked with favor upon such pleas. At a hearing on October 20, 1965, the government stated it did not oppose the acceptance of such a plea.

The primary question in the acceptance of a nolo contendere plea is whether or not under all the circumstances it is justified and whether or not the public interest will be better served by the acceptance of such a plea.

Frankly speaking, it is very…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Armour Research Foundation of Illinois Institute of Technology v. C. K. Williams & Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Polychrome Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  2. Polychrome Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API