United States v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
JUERGENS, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon the propriety of accepting a plea of NOLO CONTENDERE on behalf of the defendant, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company.
The Court has never looked with favor upon such pleas. At a hearing on October 20, 1965, the government stated it did not oppose the acceptance of such a plea.
The primary question in the acceptance of a nolo contendere plea is whether or not under all the circumstances it is justified and whether or not the public interest will be better served by the acceptance of such a plea.
Frankly speaking, it is very…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Armour Research Foundation of Illinois Institute of Technology v. C. K. Williams & Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1959
3Cited by2 opinions
- Polychrome Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Polychrome Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966