Legal Opinion

Leslie A. Duplisea v. Maine Central Railroad

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 31, 1958No. 5368PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appeal is taken from an order dismissing a complaint for lack of jurisdiction.

The complaint is conveniently vague as to the basis of federal jurisdiction. Clearly it is not diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, for the complaint alleges that plaintiff is a citizen of Maine and that defendant Railroad is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Maine. Nor is there any allegation of a breach of a duty imposed or the violation of a right given by the Constitution, the Railway Labor Act, or any other federal statute. Compare Conley v. Gibson, 1957, 355 U.S. 41, 78…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Broady v. Illinois Cent. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  5. Starke v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rumbaugh v. Winifrede Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  2. Norman Garfield Kline, Jr. v. Florida Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. International Ass'n of Machinists, AFL-CIO v. Central Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  4. International Association Of Machinists, Afl-Cio, v. Central Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  5. Rumbaugh v. Winifrede RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API