Legal Opinion

Rumbaugh v. Winifrede Railroad

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 2, 1964No. 9022PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SOBELOFF, Chief Judge.

This is another in the succession of cases since Steele v. Louisville & Nashville R. R., 323 U.S. 192, 65 S.Ct. 226, 89 L.Ed. 173 (1944), involving interpretation of the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. A. § 151 et seq., and determination of the scope of federal judicial power in its administration.

Rumbaugh has joined his former employer, Winifrede Railroad Company, and the union designated as the bargaining representative for local railroad employees as co-defendants in an action to recover damages allegedly caused by the independent and combined efforts of the defendants…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rumbaugh v. Winifrede Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API