Legal Opinion

Smith v. . Coe

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1864PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] It may be questioned, I think, in a case like this, where the defendant's liability depends entirely upon the fact of his indebtedness to a third person, and that is the issue, whether it is necessary for the judge who tries the cause to state in his decision the finding of any fact other than the existence of the indebtedness.…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Conlan v. GraceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Van Slyke v. . HyattNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Eufaula Water Co. v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. Meyer v. . AmidonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Keavey v. De RagoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API