Legal Opinion

Cavazos v. Smith

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 31, 2011No. 10-1115PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as:

565 U. S. ____

(2011) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JAVIER CAVAZOS, ACTING WARDEN v. SHIRLEY REE SMITH ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 10–1115. Decided October 31, 2011 PER CURIAM. The opinion of the Court in Jackson v. Virginia,

443 U. S. 307

(1979), makes clear that it is the responsibility of the jury—not the court—to decide what conclusions should be drawn from evidence admitted at trial. A reviewing court may set aside the jury’s verdict on the ground of insufficient evidence only if no rational…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Carey v. MusladinSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Smith v. PatrickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Shirley Ree Smith v. Gwendolyn Mitchell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. (HC) Cervantes v. SullivanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  2. (HC) Gage v. MaddenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  3. (HC) Johnson v. SpearmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. (HC) Rodriguez v. LizzaragaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (HC) Torres v. LozanoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API