Legal Opinion

(HC) Torres v. Lozano

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 27, 2020No. 2:18-cv-03136Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ENRIQUE TORRES, No. 2:18-cv-3136 MCE KJN P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 PAUL LOZANO, 15 Respondent. 16 17 I. Introduction 18 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with an application for a writ of 19 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges his 2015 conviction for first 20 degree burglary. Petitioner claims his due process rights were violated by a jury instruction that 21 permitted the jury to consider the witness’ level of certainty…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Bradshaw v. RicheySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Parker v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Wilson v. CorcoranSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API