The Fideliter
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
SAWYER, Circuit Judge.
The first point made by appellant, and which, if tenable, is fatal, is, that the district court had no jurisdiction over the vessel, and that this court has now no jurisdiction.
The ground of- the objection is, that the jurisdiction of the district courts of causes of “seizure under the laws of impost, navigation, and trade of the United Slates,” under the provisions of section 9 of the judiciary act of 1789-(1 Stat. 77), does not attach unless the property judicially proceeded against is seized prior to such proceeding, either in the district where the proceeding is had,…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Utah Liquor Control Commission v. WoorasUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- United States v. One Raft of TimberU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1882
- United States v. Eight Packages & Casks of DrugsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1910
- Allen v. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1895
- Dowell v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1886