Legal Opinion

Ford v. Lord

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1978No. 12095PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

This appeal challenges the trial court’s final judgment decreeing the specific performance of an option for the purchase of a ranch. The option was encompassed within the provisions of a 5-year lease, the validity of which is not in question. The option extended during the term of the lease and required the exercise of the option to be “by notifying the Owner in writing at least ninety days before the end of the term.” The option called for a purchase price of $50,000.00.

The owners of the property were plaintiffs-appellants Robert M. Ford and Alice C. Ford. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dunn v. BaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Duprey v. DonahoeWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Matheson v. HarrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Frasier v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Williams v. HavensIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Masters v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Ace Realty, Inc. v. AndersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. International Business MacHines Corp. v. LawhornIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Kessler v. Tortoise Development, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API