Legal Opinion

People v. Rodriguez

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided October 19, 2017No. F070900PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPoochigian, J.

*357INTRODUCTION

Appellant/defendant Domingo Rodriguez III was released from custody with an ankle monitor pursuant to the Kern County Sheriff's Department's *358Electronic Monitoring Program (EMP), subject to several terms and conditions, including that he could not leave Kern County without permission. The ankle monitor transmitted *297signals to the EMP's computer tracking system via a Global Positioning Device (GPS).

The GPS signals showed that defendant repeatedly left Kern County and went to other counties and states without asking for or receiving permission from his supervising deputy or any deputy…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. People v. BolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. WaidlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. BlacksherCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  3. City of Lavergne v. Abass I. GureCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2022
  4. Com. v. Shields, Z.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Com. v. Wallace, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API